Do you believe that media institutions should be allowed to gain information through any means necessary to create a story?

- Basicly explain the background of this ieda of media invasion of privacy, referencing the leverson inquiry as it is a recent inssue, and show how there are both benfits and drawbacks to this.. (Such as being able to gather information that may shed some light on the issue or how it invades sombodies private information to foind out about this case.
-Show the negative aspects of this issue, starting with the Millie Dowler case as an example of how the leveson inquiry began and expand on different cases that have emerged because of this.
-Then follow up with  what exactly the negative aspects of these cases is (Specifically invasion of privacy due to it being a media debate).
-After, write about the instituion that control many of the perpertrators of the phone hacking (Rupert Murdoch) and say something about his large influence.
-Write about the benefits of phone hacking and other invasiive methods of gaining information.
- Write about an example of where this may have been useful or use a specific example.
-Evaluate the pro's and cons of each.
-Throw in my own opinion for good measure.
-fin.